WIP Chikuma, Yukikaze, Ukuru and I-58 for size comparison. The Tamiya Chikuma looks to be pre-First Wartime Modification in March, 1943, albeit with the biplane seaplanes, probably pre-Pearl Harbor? The Tamiya Yukikaze is is late war fit. The I-58 is 7/1944 to 4/1945 fit (prior to removal of seaplane in 5/1945). The Ukuru class is 1944-45.
Saturday, August 29, 2015
IJN Ukuru-class Kaikoban, IJN DD Yukikaze, IJN CA Chikuma and IJN I-58
This is the Pit Road 1/350 Ukuru-class Kaikoban with the Tom's Model Works PE set as WIP. For size comparison, a Type VII-A U-Boat under construction is nearby (Hobby Boss - need to change the dual rudder to single rudder), as is the Aoshima I-58, which is larger than the Ukuru. In the far background is the RM Pola CA by Hobby Boss - which was only $16 but the decks don't even match up. Probably won't waste any more time with that kit.
WIP Chikuma, Yukikaze, Ukuru and I-58 for size comparison. The Tamiya Chikuma looks to be pre-First Wartime Modification in March, 1943, albeit with the biplane seaplanes, probably pre-Pearl Harbor? The Tamiya Yukikaze is is late war fit. The I-58 is 7/1944 to 4/1945 fit (prior to removal of seaplane in 5/1945). The Ukuru class is 1944-45.
WIP Chikuma, Yukikaze, Ukuru and I-58 for size comparison. The Tamiya Chikuma looks to be pre-First Wartime Modification in March, 1943, albeit with the biplane seaplanes, probably pre-Pearl Harbor? The Tamiya Yukikaze is is late war fit. The I-58 is 7/1944 to 4/1945 fit (prior to removal of seaplane in 5/1945). The Ukuru class is 1944-45.
Saturday, February 21, 2015
Sd.Kfz. 251/9 Ausf. D Frühe - Kanonenwagen aka Stummel
Sd.Kfz. 251/9 Ausf. D Frühe - Kanonenwagen aka Stummel
First step was to install the front gun shield into the Dragon hull. At first glance, this seemed to be easy, but upon further examination, the fact that the Dragon upper hull apparently is 2-3 mm too narrow, the Tamiya gun shield is too wide. (There is a visually notice difference in shapes between the Dragon and Tamiya upper hulls.) Also, the angle of the front plate is slightly different between the two models. Long and short, ended up having to trim the width of the gun shield and replace the front plate. For the driver’s side, the Dragon front plate was cannibalized, but the cut out for the visor meant that on the other side the front plate had to be assembled from plastic card. The welds from the Dragon visor were cut off and attached to the top and side. It ended up being a lot more work than expected. The picture below shows the result – gray is Dragon, tan is Tamiya and white is plastic card. The upper hull is sitting on the old Tamiya chassis for now.
Balkenkruz and loading stencil are from Archer Fine Transfers. Rear license plates are from the Tamiya SdKfz 251/9 kit - will use "534" and 2. Panzerdivision marking from Tamiya as well. Need to add antenna and weather.
Had a partially assembled Tamiya Sd.Kfz. 251/9 ausf. D frühe from the 1990s
lying around. The remaining parts had
long gone missing, and the kit seemed relegated to the never-to-be-finished
pile.
Also, had an un-built Dragon Sd.Kfz. 251 ausf. D 3-1. Was tempted to build it as the Sd.Kfz. 251/9 ausf. D späthe
version. However, also have the AFV
Club Sd.Kfz. 251/9 ausf. D, which, from reviews, appears to be a more accurate
version. The plain Sd.Kfz. 251/1
version didn’t seem to be interesting and nor did the IR version, which
apparently has some accuracy issues.
For something different, decided to try to kit-bash a Sd.Kfz.
251/9 ausf. D frühe
based on the Dragon kit, but with parts as needed from the Tamiya kit, such as
the floor gun mount and front gun shield.
Some initial research shows that the Tamiya kit lacks the gun shield
supports, to that has to be added.
Additionally, the 75 mm main gun had cuts in the deflector shield not
shown on the Tamiya or Dragon gun, so that change has to be made. The driver’s seat was cut down low as well,
so that is another necessary change.
Thought about changing the gun barrel to make use of the nice metal
barrel provided by Dragon, but with the gun already assembled and the difference
between the early and late mantles, may have to just go with the Tamiya gun
barrel.
First step was to install the front gun shield into the Dragon hull. At first glance, this seemed to be easy, but upon further examination, the fact that the Dragon upper hull apparently is 2-3 mm too narrow, the Tamiya gun shield is too wide. (There is a visually notice difference in shapes between the Dragon and Tamiya upper hulls.) Also, the angle of the front plate is slightly different between the two models. Long and short, ended up having to trim the width of the gun shield and replace the front plate. For the driver’s side, the Dragon front plate was cannibalized, but the cut out for the visor meant that on the other side the front plate had to be assembled from plastic card. The welds from the Dragon visor were cut off and attached to the top and side. It ended up being a lot more work than expected. The picture below shows the result – gray is Dragon, tan is Tamiya and white is plastic card. The upper hull is sitting on the old Tamiya chassis for now.
Below - the heavily shortened driver figure next to the original, as well as the torso of the driver figures from the Dragon Sd.Kfz. 251 3 in 1 kit and the Cyber Hobby Sd.Kfz. 253 kit.
Balkenkruz and loading stencil are from Archer Fine Transfers. Rear license plates are from the Tamiya SdKfz 251/9 kit - will use "534" and 2. Panzerdivision marking from Tamiya as well. Need to add antenna and weather.
Thursday, February 05, 2015
Wednesday, February 04, 2015
Zis-5
Woof!
I was warned. I had read a number of reviews of the Alan
Zis-5 truck in its prior incarnation as a Dragon/Alan rebox noting that the kit
has issues. But lured by the rock bottom
price, I decided to try it in its Ark Models incarnation, figuring that it
would be a relatively short build and I could abandon it without too much pain
if it was too much of a dog.
I decided to start with the cargo
bed, because the reviews indicated that the cargo bed had minimal
problems. Indeed, while there were some
minor fit issues between side supports and the base of the cargo bed, the cargo
bed went together fairly well. Based on
some reference pictures, it looks like the underside of the cargo bed, as well
as interior faces of supports were left as plain, unpainted wood.
The undercarriage was next. Although fairly complex, the engineering
actually seemed fairly decent. However,
then putting together the front wheel assembly, it looks like the molds were
placed in the wrong way because half of one piece was molded correctly, but the
other half not – consistent with one of the molds being reversed. So had to make do with some substitutes. We’ll have to see how it looks because much
of the undercarriage is visible.
The wheels are rightly indicated
by reviewers to be among the worst parts.
After some hesitation, I purchased the Hussar Production replacement
Zis-5 and Zis-6 wheels – even though the cost was more than the kit
itself. The wheels are nicely done in
resin, although the interior hub for the front wheels look like they may have
been damaged when removed from their casting connection.
Painting references suggest that
the undercarriage frame and maybe headlights were in black. Olive green (Tamiya) was used for the cab and
cargo bed.
Tentatively decided to go with
captured truck, using dunkelgelb as camouflage overspray. Maybe add headlight covers, notek light,
license plates and pioneer tools per an amalgamation of various references. Wiring for the headlights and, presumably,
notek light, goes through the fenders.
Because the fenders and undercarriage are so open, may need to have
wiring to the engine itself.
Note underside of bed and supports left in natural wood color (or hopefully at least a moderately reasonable facsimile thereof - Tamiya wooden deck tan). The headlights are wired but not yet connected.
Cab not glued but just fitted in place (hence gaps). Sunshade at top of windshield also not yet fitted. Some random cargo added for visual interest.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)